C−BOARD
  新規投稿 ┃ツリー表示 ┃スレッド表示 ┃一覧表示 ┃トピック表示 ┃検索 ┃設定 ┃ホーム ┃利用規約  
397 / 893 ツリー ←次へ | 前へ→

【32053】ARBの比較 kusakari 13/7/10(水) 7:44 [未読]

【32053】ARBの比較
←back ↑menu ↑top forward→
 kusakari  - 13/7/10(水) 7:44 -

引用なし
パスワード
   We identified 54 186 patients with diabetes who started taking an angiotensinreceptor blocker during the study period. After multivariable adjustment, patients who took either telmisartan (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–0.97) or valsartan (adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.95) had a lower risk of the composite outcome compared with patients who took irbesartan. In contrast, no significant difference in risk was seen between other angiotensin-receptor blockers and irbesartan. In secondary analyses, we found a reduced risk of admission to hospital for heart failure with telmisartan compared with irbesartan (adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66– 0.96), but no significant differences in risk were seen between angiotensin-receptor blockers in our other secondary analyses.

http://www.cmaj.ca/content/early/2013/07/08/cmaj.121771

糖尿病性大血管障害のリスクへの影響。

テルミサルタンとカンデサルタンが イルベサルタンよりも有意にリスクを下げるとの事ですが・・・

397 / 893 ツリー ←次へ | 前へ→
  新規投稿 ┃ツリー表示 ┃スレッド表示 ┃一覧表示 ┃トピック表示 ┃検索 ┃設定 ┃ホーム ┃利用規約  
ページ:  ┃  記事番号:   
1376741
(SS)C-BOARD Legacy v0.95.06 beta
Webmaster Dr.Kusakari & nikkori